Are The Outlandish Claims Of Ritual Abuse And Sacrifice Proving To Be True?
In September 2017, a story began to appear on news and media platforms concerning the mass grave of hundreds of children at an orphanage run by the Catholic church in Lanarkshire in the south of Scotland. Around four-hundred bodies of babies and toddlers were discovered in an unmarked area of St. Mary’s Cemetery. All of the victims are alleged to have been in the care of Smyllum Park Orphanage, which looked after almost 12,000 children between 1864 and 1981.
Frank Docherty and Jim Kane, both local residents of the area, made the discovery as part of their investigation into abuse at the care home following claims by several former residents. Each of them both passed away at the beginning of 2017, but before their deaths, each of them stated their belief that the number of bodies in the grounds was likely to be much higher than the four-hundred they had found.
Although the records of children that died there state such things as “natural causes”, “TB” and “pneumonia”, testing of the remains suggests physical injury, possibly so severe that it would be a direct cause of death. They suggest, in no uncertain terms, there was systematic child abuse at work behind the walls of the orphanage. You can read a little more about this story here.
Perhaps these claims should be taken all the more serious when considered alongside the similar circumstances at a “former home for unmarried mothers and their babies” in County Galway, Ireland. The remains – numbering just short of eight-hundred – are thought to range from fetuses of thirty-five weeks to toddlers of age two or three years, and initial carbon dating suggests they are from the 1950s (although it is possible they could be from any time the home was active between 1925-1961).
You can read more about that here and check out the videos below which look at the aforementioned recent discoveries.
Although the records of children that died there state such things as “natural causes”, “TB” and “pneumonia”, testing of the remains suggests physical injury, possibly so severe that it would be a direct cause of death. They suggest, in no uncertain terms, there was systematic child abuse at work behind the walls of the orphanage. You can read a little more about this story here.
Perhaps these claims should be taken all the more serious when considered alongside the similar circumstances at a “former home for unmarried mothers and their babies” in County Galway, Ireland. The remains – numbering just short of eight-hundred – are thought to range from fetuses of thirty-five weeks to toddlers of age two or three years, and initial carbon dating suggests they are from the 1950s (although it is possible they could be from any time the home was active between 1925-1961).
You can read more about that here and check out the videos below which look at the aforementioned recent discoveries.
|
|
Claims Of Ted Heath Go Back Decades!
While he is certainly not alone in such assertions, author, and researcher, David Icke, has long claimed that abuse was taking place in such establishments as those mentioned above. So even those most skeptical of Icke’s work must begin to ask, if he was right about these such claims, perhaps he was right about others. Incidentally, as we will look at a little later, there are many who remain more than skeptical.
In the vast majority of his books, but perhaps more predominantly in The Biggest Secret and Children of the Matrix, Icke tells of accounts of specific cases of such abuse, involving (according to Icke) many prominent, household names of people in positions of power.
Taking the question a little further, if he was right about the subject of ritual abuse, then what other “general subjects” may be true.
Perhaps one of the most intriguing might be the claims he has repeatedly made about former British Prime Minister, Ted Heath, who incidentally, is currently under investigation for alleged links to pedophile activity. You can read more about that here and here.
Icke claims he was informed of the alleged activities of Heath by an anonymous woman in England in the late-1990s, and then of a further particular account that took place at Burnham Beeches in the early-1970s by another witness.
According to Icke, not only was Heath a pedophile, but he was also involved in the satanic abuse (and sacrifice) of children. Further to that, Heath, according to Icke, was a shape-shifting reptilian, whose lust for blood – particularly that of children – was something primeval contained within his alien make-up. Check out the short video below which features Icke speaking about Ted Heath.
In the vast majority of his books, but perhaps more predominantly in The Biggest Secret and Children of the Matrix, Icke tells of accounts of specific cases of such abuse, involving (according to Icke) many prominent, household names of people in positions of power.
Taking the question a little further, if he was right about the subject of ritual abuse, then what other “general subjects” may be true.
Perhaps one of the most intriguing might be the claims he has repeatedly made about former British Prime Minister, Ted Heath, who incidentally, is currently under investigation for alleged links to pedophile activity. You can read more about that here and here.
Icke claims he was informed of the alleged activities of Heath by an anonymous woman in England in the late-1990s, and then of a further particular account that took place at Burnham Beeches in the early-1970s by another witness.
According to Icke, not only was Heath a pedophile, but he was also involved in the satanic abuse (and sacrifice) of children. Further to that, Heath, according to Icke, was a shape-shifting reptilian, whose lust for blood – particularly that of children – was something primeval contained within his alien make-up. Check out the short video below which features Icke speaking about Ted Heath.
|
|
One specific account, told in both of the aforementioned Icke books, describes these claims in detail. In The Biggest Secret Icke writes:
“On more than one occasion, she says, she was brutally raped by a man who has been a major name in United Kingdom politics for decades. This man, she says, used to hold her naked body to him using hooks inserted into her flesh at the hip!”
According to Icke, he further writes that this happened to the witness when she was only a little girl, before naming the person committing the alleged crime as Ted Heath, who Icke further writes, “….his (Heath’s) name comes up again and again in interviews with victims of Satanic abuse in Britain!”
In the book Children of the Matrix Icke writes of the alleged Burnham Beeches account:
In the book Children of the Matrix Icke writes of the alleged Burnham Beeches account:
“…She said that one night in the 1970s, while Ted Heath was Prime Minister, she was walking through the woods after dark when she saw some lights. Quietly, she moved forward to see what they were and to her horror, she saw a Satanic ritual involving Heath.”
According to the account, several people, all dressed in dark, hooded robes were present in a circle around Heath. Icke continues:
“She said as she watched, hidden among the trees and undergrowth, Heath began to transform into a reptile and she said what staggered her was no-one in the circle looked the least bit surprised!”
Icke claims his source informed him that Heath “grew by some two feet” and was a “full-bodied reptiloid” even adding that “he spoke (when transformed) fairly naturally although it sounded like long distance!”
Who Knew What, And When?
Now those statements are perhaps as outlandish as one can make, of that, there is no doubt. That being said, as investigations show, it certainly appears possible that there could be, at the very least, certain elements of truth to them.
So, is the case of Ted Heath, presuming the former Prime Minister does indeed have a case to answer, one of the terrible realities of abuse, or do they really involve satanic elements? And of course, if there is any truth in that, might there be truth in the claims of shape-shifting reptilians, as crazy as that sounds? Perhaps that is a question most people don’t wish to contemplate, either through fear of the answer or due to the ridiculousness of the assertion.
Icke tells of numerous other accounts in his books and on his website – including systematic breeding and “taking of babies” for use in Satanic rituals, mind control and generally a tight control on the politics of the world.
Interestingly or not, several UFO accounts (if for one moment the claims of shape-shifting aliens are to be believed) speak of “tall beings in dark, hooded robes!”, as well as the repeated accounts of people being pregnant and of having the fetus simply disappear from their wombs following UFO encounters.
It should be noted that as much as investigations are underway against Ted Heath, as well as several others, including the highly controversial government investigations following the revelations of Jimmy Savile, (which itself has had numerous stalls and starts – something many believe is an attempt to bury the truth), many of the other people named in Icke’s books have not had (to the best knowledge at the time of writing) any serious investigations or actions against them. In fact, perhaps it is the one person who Icke failed to mention, Jimmy Savile, that draws much of the criticism.
There are many – who it should be said are sceptical at best of Icke’s claims and authenticity – who believe, given Icke’s time working at the BBC throughout the 1980s, and given the apparent “best-kept secret” nature of the activities of Savile, it is inconceivable, to them, that he could not have known about them as well (Icke maintains he learnt of Savile’s activities in the late-1990s).
If as Icke has written about for two decades, the ritual abuse of children involving “elites in society” has been taking place, it would appear Savile, considering the revelations following his death, would have been very much at the center of them. Particularly when taking into account his network of connections and the high regard with which the public viewed him. Icke however, failed to mention these activities in any of his books. Before we look at this a little further, check out the trailer below from Don't Mention The Reptilians - it makes for interesting and appropriate viewing here.
So, is the case of Ted Heath, presuming the former Prime Minister does indeed have a case to answer, one of the terrible realities of abuse, or do they really involve satanic elements? And of course, if there is any truth in that, might there be truth in the claims of shape-shifting reptilians, as crazy as that sounds? Perhaps that is a question most people don’t wish to contemplate, either through fear of the answer or due to the ridiculousness of the assertion.
Icke tells of numerous other accounts in his books and on his website – including systematic breeding and “taking of babies” for use in Satanic rituals, mind control and generally a tight control on the politics of the world.
Interestingly or not, several UFO accounts (if for one moment the claims of shape-shifting aliens are to be believed) speak of “tall beings in dark, hooded robes!”, as well as the repeated accounts of people being pregnant and of having the fetus simply disappear from their wombs following UFO encounters.
It should be noted that as much as investigations are underway against Ted Heath, as well as several others, including the highly controversial government investigations following the revelations of Jimmy Savile, (which itself has had numerous stalls and starts – something many believe is an attempt to bury the truth), many of the other people named in Icke’s books have not had (to the best knowledge at the time of writing) any serious investigations or actions against them. In fact, perhaps it is the one person who Icke failed to mention, Jimmy Savile, that draws much of the criticism.
There are many – who it should be said are sceptical at best of Icke’s claims and authenticity – who believe, given Icke’s time working at the BBC throughout the 1980s, and given the apparent “best-kept secret” nature of the activities of Savile, it is inconceivable, to them, that he could not have known about them as well (Icke maintains he learnt of Savile’s activities in the late-1990s).
If as Icke has written about for two decades, the ritual abuse of children involving “elites in society” has been taking place, it would appear Savile, considering the revelations following his death, would have been very much at the center of them. Particularly when taking into account his network of connections and the high regard with which the public viewed him. Icke however, failed to mention these activities in any of his books. Before we look at this a little further, check out the trailer below from Don't Mention The Reptilians - it makes for interesting and appropriate viewing here.
For his part, and in his defense, Icke states that he did not write about the apparent exploits of Jimmy Savile (despite him being aware of them) due to the fact that he had had no contact with any of the actual victims, and instead had all the information given to him by second and third hand sources (whereas he spoke directly to the person who claimed she was abused by Heath). Because of this, there was a fear of legal action being taken against him.
You have to ask, given the claims made about world famous politicians and such powerful figures as the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, why would Icke fear someone such as Savile – a mere entertainer? Is his reasoning of no contact with the victims reasonable? Or might Savile have wielded more power than even most imagine, and was he involved in the “ritual abuse network” that Icke claims to have exposed? Is it possible that Icke underestimated the crimes (and reach) of Savile, and instead focused on bigger names such as Heath (and George Bush and members of the British Royal family – who he also regularly names) for obvious reasons of publicity and the belief in “striking as high up the chain” as he could?
Check out the short video below - one of many to be found on the Internet featuring Icke explaining his theory of the Reptilians.
You have to ask, given the claims made about world famous politicians and such powerful figures as the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, why would Icke fear someone such as Savile – a mere entertainer? Is his reasoning of no contact with the victims reasonable? Or might Savile have wielded more power than even most imagine, and was he involved in the “ritual abuse network” that Icke claims to have exposed? Is it possible that Icke underestimated the crimes (and reach) of Savile, and instead focused on bigger names such as Heath (and George Bush and members of the British Royal family – who he also regularly names) for obvious reasons of publicity and the belief in “striking as high up the chain” as he could?
Check out the short video below - one of many to be found on the Internet featuring Icke explaining his theory of the Reptilians.
Outrageous Claims And Dark Conspiracies
Perhaps it is worth noting here, that many of the initial claims of such systematic abuse (and reptilian shape-shifters in power) came from a lady called Arizona Wilder, who by his own admission, Icke was warned by people close to him “not to trust” as she was “spreading disinformation!” However, Icke claims to have spoken to “dozens” of people who have seen the same thing.
Or are the claims against Heath (should they be proven true) just a “coincidence” and the claims against other such powerful people be dismissed as fantasy (as many do)?
As outrageous as some of the claims made by Icke undoubtedly are, elements of them are starting to come to the surface. Given the number of investigations into chronic child abuse underway at the moment, perhaps such outlandish claims – whether it be about ritual abuse, satanic cults or reptilian aliens – while not being accepted as truth, should be looked at with fresh eyes and perspective, both of which need to be open.
We have written before about the Satanic Panic and highlighted a number of cases – some of which were very high profile at the time - that appeared to have been incidents of people being wrongly accused. Icke maintains that some of these cases are essentially covered up, and the video below, would appear to support, at least in part, that general premise. It is a short video of secret rituals and societies. The first account tells of a FBI raid that uncovered a satanic cult, including the claim from former FBI chief, Ted Gunderson that most occult and satanic raids are controlled by high ranking agents and so are usually covered up and kept out of the public arena, even going on to say that the FBI and the US government is controlled by such satanic groups. On this occasion, the raid went ahead with “standard” low-level agents who had no such agenda or orders. Make of that, and all the claims and counterclaims, what you will.
Check out the videos below that – the first two feature extensive talks by the aforementioned Gunderson. The following look at the claims of satanic ritual abuse a little further.
[Marcus Lowth September 2017]
Or are the claims against Heath (should they be proven true) just a “coincidence” and the claims against other such powerful people be dismissed as fantasy (as many do)?
As outrageous as some of the claims made by Icke undoubtedly are, elements of them are starting to come to the surface. Given the number of investigations into chronic child abuse underway at the moment, perhaps such outlandish claims – whether it be about ritual abuse, satanic cults or reptilian aliens – while not being accepted as truth, should be looked at with fresh eyes and perspective, both of which need to be open.
We have written before about the Satanic Panic and highlighted a number of cases – some of which were very high profile at the time - that appeared to have been incidents of people being wrongly accused. Icke maintains that some of these cases are essentially covered up, and the video below, would appear to support, at least in part, that general premise. It is a short video of secret rituals and societies. The first account tells of a FBI raid that uncovered a satanic cult, including the claim from former FBI chief, Ted Gunderson that most occult and satanic raids are controlled by high ranking agents and so are usually covered up and kept out of the public arena, even going on to say that the FBI and the US government is controlled by such satanic groups. On this occasion, the raid went ahead with “standard” low-level agents who had no such agenda or orders. Make of that, and all the claims and counterclaims, what you will.
Check out the videos below that – the first two feature extensive talks by the aforementioned Gunderson. The following look at the claims of satanic ritual abuse a little further.
[Marcus Lowth September 2017]
The Bizarre Predictions And Apparent Influence Of Time-Travelling Soldier, John Titor
To most who are familiar with the claims of John Titor, they are nothing but a hoax, either for someone’s amusement, or for potential monetary gain. To those who have studied them a little deeper however, there are some intriguing revelations....
Underground Cities! “Cluster” Disappearances! - The Reptilian Connection? The “Evidence” Is Stronger Than You Might Think! Reptilians and claims that they are behind major events on planet Earth are usually a step too far for most people. However, when you start to go through the "evidence", it begins to make more sense than you might think..... From THE ANCIENT ASTRONAUT THEORY |
The Satanic Panic – A Modern Day Scientific Witch Hunt? In the 1980s and 1990s considerable time and effort was spent on Satanic cults - a period now referred to as The Satanic Panic.... From CONSPIRACIES AND UNSOLVED MYSTERIES |
From The Ant People And The Hopi Tribe to Admiral Richard Byrd – How Credible Is The Hollow Earth Theory? When looked at from an unbiased perspective, the Hollow Earth theory isn't as crazy as it sounds.... From MYSTERIES FROM ANTIQUITY |